Generally, subcontractors who submit a bid to a higher-tier contractor (we’ll assume it’s the prime in this case) on a public works job are making a positive affirmation that they are in it for the long haul. In other words, the very act of submitting a bid is basically the same as saying “You getta the contract, I signa the subcontract." (fn 1)
So, in our example, you’ve submitted your bid. And then the prime turns around and sends you its “form” subcontract. Which bears as much resemblance to your bid as I do to a supermodel (hint: not much). So what do you do? Do you have to sign the subcontract under the general “signa the contract” rule that we talked about in the first paragraph?
Sound unfair?
Then you’re in the wrong business, bub.
So what’s the upshot? The upshot is, if at all possible, be familiar with the requirements of your scope of work under the prime contract bid documents. That way, if your bid conforms to those requirements, and then the prime tries to get you to sign a contract that has egregiously different terms and threatens to “boota you fanny” off the project if you don’t sign, you will have a much greater chance of either a) calling its bluff and staying on the job or b) suing the crud out of that contractor and recovering your lost profits.
Hope you’ve learned something. If not, it’s notta my fault. Must be a language barrier. Tune in next time, maybe we’ll talk more about substitution issues. Maybe not. I like to keep it mysterious.
(fn 2) Et seq. means “and the ones following that one.” Why speak in Latin? Because pig-Latin, as we all know, is a ridiculous language, and therefore only used in argument before Congress.